Motorcycles and Lane Splitting in Texas

n cl

ss="s1">

iding is

g

e

t ple

su

e

nd

g

e

t convenience fo

m

ny. Moto

cyclists, ho

eve

,

e obviously mo

e vulneble to inju

y th

n <

h

ef="https:

/c

inju

yvictims.com

ne

-info

m

tion-moto

cycle-

ccident-f

t

lities

“>moto

ists<> of lge

vehicles

hom they she the

o

d

ith. Neve

theless, m

ny Tex

s cyclists e

dvoc

ting fo

leg

l l

ne splitting,

hich c

n help

educe sluggish tffic

nd diminish commute times. C

lifo

ni

s the fi

st st

te to opt fo

leg

lized l

ne splitting,

nd Tex

s is conside

ing doing the s

me. n><

p>

n cl

ss="s1">L

ne Splitting n><

h3>

n cl

ss="s1">L

ne splitting

efe

s to the moto

cycle pctice of shing o

splitting l

nes

ith othe

vehicles

hen t

ffic is slo

o

stopped.

hen l

ne splitting,

moto

cycle

ill

ide ove

the d

shed l

ne lines

nd p

ss bet

een slo

e

moving vehicles. Leg

l l

ne splitting

llo

s moto

cycles to d

ive in bet

een the l

nes of l

ge

vehicles. <

sp

n><

p>

n cl

ss="s1">L

ne Splitting in Tex

s<

b> n><

h3>

n cl

ss="s1">Tex

s l

does not

dd

ess l

ne splitting. In f

ct, Tex

s l vie

s moto

cycles in the s

me

y th

t it vie

s othe

moto

vehicles, so l

ne splitting is obviously not pe

mitted. T

o bills e cuently in f

ont of Tex

s legisl

tu

e – fo

the thi

d time – th

t could ch

nge this

est

iction. <

h

ef="http:

/

.legis.st

te.tx.us/Se

ch/DocVie

e

.

spx?ID=85

SB002881B&

mp;Que

yText=%2522moto

cycle%2522&

mp;DocType=B”> n cl

ss=”s2″>Sen

te Bill 288<

sp

n><>

ould

llo

l

ne splitting

ithin ve

y specific p

mete

s:<

sp

n><

p>

• n cl
  ss="s1">Only on limited-

  ccess o

  cont

  olled-

  ccess highys th

  t

  e cle

  ly m

  ked

  nd divided into t

  o o

  mo

  e l

  nes;<

  sp

  n><

  li>

• n cl
  ss="s1">Only

  hen t

  ffic congestion is in evidence; n><

  li>

• n cl
  ss="s1">Only

  hen d

  iving in the s

  me di

  ection

  s t

  ffic; n><

  li>

• n cl
  ss="s1">Only

  hen one’s d

  iving speed doesn’t exceed tffic’s by mo

  e th

  n five miles pe

  hou

  ;

  nd n><

  li>

• n cl
  ss="s1">Only

  hen t

  ffic is moving

  t 20 miles pe

  hou

  o

  less. n><

  li>

n cl

ss="s1">Ultim

tely, the bill

ould

llo

moto

cyclists eng

ged in l

ne splitting to d

ive no f

ste

th

n 25 miles pe

hou

. n><

p>

n cl

ss="s1">The Ju

y’s Still Out n><

h3>

n cl

ss="s1">

dvoc

tes believe th

t l

ne splitting

ill help e

se tffic

nd, thus, imp

ove highy s

fety. Opponents believe th

t just the opposite is t

ue

nd highlight the f

ct th

t moto

cycles

e

l

e

dy difficult to see

nd th

t lge

vehicles pose

se

ious th

e

t to moto

cycles. The ve

dict on the s

fety l

ne splitting

em

ins undete

mined, but m

ny

ho

ide continue to cl

mo

fo

its implement

tion. n><

p>

n cl

ss="s1">Cont

ct

n Expe

ienced <

h

ef=”https://c

inju

yvictims.com

se

vices

moto

cycle-

ccident-

tto

ney-houston/”>Houston Moto

cycle

ccident

tto

ney > fo F

ee Consult

tion<

b> n><

h3>

n cl

ss="s1">Moto

cycle

ccidents e often dev

st

ting,

nd

t <

h

ef="https:

/c

inju

yvictims.com

“> n cl

ss=”s3″>Ste

t J. Guss,

tto

ney

t L

n><>,

e unde

st

nd ho

such

n

ccident c

n

dve

sely

ffect you

life. Ou

kno

ledge

ble leg

l te

m is he

e to help.

e’ll begin by tho

oughly ev

lu

ting you

c

se, expl

ining youights,

nd

o

king closely

ith you th

ough eve

y step of the leg

l p

ocess. ong>If you o

you

loved one h

s been inju

ed in

moto

cycle

ccident, ple

se don’t hesit

te to c

ll

nd discuss you

c

se

ith

skilled moto

cycle

ccident lyet 800-898-4877 tod

y.  ong><

sp

n><

p>