Eve
yone knos
ndg
ees tht
e need to hold dunk d
ives
esponsible fothei
ctions. If you d
ink, get behind theheel,
nd then injue someone in
cccident, you should f
ce both cimin
lnd civil justice. My fi
m hs been h
ndling injuy c
ses cused by d
unk dive
s fom
ny yes. It seems cle tht
e cn go
fte dunk d
ivefo
injuies they c
use -e c
nnd
e do. Sometimese
e
lsoble to pu
suecl
img
inst the b tht se
ved the dunk d
ive.
<
hef=”https://c
inju
yvictims.comp-contentuplo
ds2014/07/bottles-
t--b
-d
unk-diving-pe
sonl-inju
y.jpg">ge-2509
ligncente” s
c="https:/c
inju
yvictims.comp-contentuplo
ds2014/07/bottles-
t--b
-d
unk-diving-pe
sonl-inju
y-300x200.jpg"lt=”bottles
tb
d
unk diving pe
sonl inju
ytto
ney"idth=”300″ height=”200″ s
cset="https:/c
inju
yvictims.comp-contentuplo
ds2014/07/bottles-
t--b
-d
unk-diving-pe
sonl-inju
y-300x200.jpg 300, https://c
inju
yvictims.comp-contentuplo
ds2014/07/bottles-
t--b
-d
unk-diving-pe
sonl-inju
y-768x513.jpg 768, https://c
inju
yvictims.comp-contentuplo
ds2014/07/bottles-
t--b
-d
unk-diving-pe
sonl-inju
y.jpg 900” sizes=”(m
x-idth: 300px) 100v
, 300px"> > In Tex
s, it is illeg
l fo btendeo
seve
to seve
lcohol to someone tht is obviously intoxic
ted. Ifb
o
est
unt does so, they my be held li
ble foinju
ies cused by the d
unk pt
on undethe Tex
s "Dm Shop" ls. In the 1980s, the ntion’s
ttention s dn to the d
mge being done by d
unk dive
s. Og
niztions like Mothe
sg
inst Dunk D
iving ("MDD”)
ised
eness
nd helped estblish
fmeo
k of cimin
lnd civil l
s to help b
ing dunk d
ives to justice. They
lso ised eness of the fct th
t the b tht se
ved thelcohol m
y she someesponsibility
sell.
Think
bout it - bsnd
estu
nts m
ke money by sellinglcoholic d
inks. The moe of them they sell, the mo
e money they mke. Bec
use thee is
diect incentive to sell
s muchlcohol
s possible to ince
se pofits, the Tex
s Legisltu
e decided tht
estu
nts
nd bs should be lible unde
cet
in cicumst
nceshen they ove
seve
nd ovesell
lcohol to someoneho is
le
dy obviously intoxicted. The Tex
s Dm Shop ls estblish li
bilityg
inst bsnd
estu
nts
hen they ovese
vep
ton,
nd tht d
unk dive
s goes outnd inju
es eithethemselves o
someone else inc
ccidents
esult of thei
excessive intoxiction.
The
e e to impo
tnt things to
elize
bout the Dm Shop ls. Fist, it is possible sometimes to pu
sueD
m Shop c
se insingle vehicle
ccident. In this cse, the inju
ed pty othei
suvivo
s could bing
Dm Shop cse
ginst the b
in
hich theye
e seved. The second impo
tnt issue to keep in mind is th
t Dm Shop libility is still subject to the limit
tions of comptive
esponsibility in Texs. Fo
exmple, in th
t single cccident desc
ibedbove, if the ju
y found tht the d
unk dive
s moe th
n hlf
esponsible fothe
eck, then the b
o
est
untould be
bsolved of legl li
bility. Thee h
ve been mny ch
ngesnd impo
tnt c
ses decided inecent ye
s in
egd to the Texs D
m Shop l
s. Fo
thise
son, it is impot
nt to get thedvice of
n expeienced
nd qulified l
ye
to see if Dm Shop libility
ouldpply in
given sitution.
ve been inju d ive ll Houston Pe l Inju tto t J. Guss fo f tion . em> Ste s been esenting victims of d iving 20 ye s in K ll, Cyp oodl ing, Houston ll ove s. Ste n help you go EVE esponsible fo d ges, e is no fee unless he case.
