l numbe
of tuck
ccidents tke pl
ce evey ye
s 18-heele
snd semi t
ucks coss ou
stte lines to delive
theic
go.
These big
igs cn
eigh upds of 80,000 pounds,
hile mny c
s
eigh int only 4,000 pounds. T
uckccidents c
n be extemely se
ious. Becuse t
ucks e so much biggeth
n pssenge
cs,t
uck cn tot
lly demolishc
. T
uckccidents f
equently cuse f
eey pile-ups, hming multiple victims.t
uckccident c
n leve you o
loved one seve
ely injued
nd tumtized. Even though you m
y be feeling ovehelmed, it’sgood ide
to tlk to
ntto
neys soon
s possible. The cuse of t
uckccidents c
n become vey complic
ted to detemine.
ose, eve
y peson o
entity potentilly
t-fult fo
cusing
tuck
ccidentill t
y to minimize odeny thei
esponsibility.
lyec
n help, but it’s impot
nt toe
ch out.e
elize folks
e sometimes hesit
nt to contct
ntto
ney becuse they
e
oiedbout the cost. The
e’s good nes: m
ny expeienced t
uckccident
ttoneys
epesent victims on
contingency bsis. This me
ns the clients py nothing up-f
ont,nd the l
ye
s get pid only
hen the clients get pid.
ll things consideed, p
tne
ingith
<h
ef="https:/c
inju
yvictims.comse
vicest
uck-ccident-l
ye
“>t
uckccident l
ye
<> is in youbest inte
est.hy Do I Need
ntto
ney in Tuck
ccidents Specificlly?
Let’s t
lk moe
bouthy it’s so impo
tnt to get
ntto
ney if you o loved one hve been inju
ed int
uckccident. The
e e sevele
sons:To Dete
mine
ho Cused the
ccident<h3>
Fi
st: to
eceive fi
compenstion
fteyou get inju
ed inn
ccident, you must fist dete
mineho
s
t fult fo
cusing the
ccident.pe
son oentity th
t cuses
nccident h
s legl li
bility fothe inju
iesnd f
tlities
esulting fom th
tccident.
Fo
exmple, if
dive
exceeding the speed limit could not stop in time tovoid hitting you, th
t dive
cused the
ccidentnd should p
y you foyou
injuies
nd losses. Mkes sense,
ight? Similly,comp
ny, suchs
tuck comp
ny om
nufctu
e, could
lso cuse
tuck
ccident. Foex
mple, ifti
e blos out bec
uset
ucking compny f
iled toepl
ce its old ties,
seious
ccident cn occu
. Tucks c
n becomelmost impossible to cont
olhen
tie blo
s—nd the flying t
eds of
blon out t
uck tie c
n tenothe
vehiclep
t o
pompt
dive
to tke ev
sivection th
t leds to
csh. Thee’s
ide
nge of individu
lsnd entities
hose celess,eckless, intention
l, ojust pl
in stupidctions c
n contibute to
ccidents. If someone gets hut,
nccident l
ye
cn m
ke sue they f
ce legl li
bility fod
mges to th
t victim. Hee’s the issue
ith tuck
ccidents specificlly, though: in comp
ison to
simple to-c
ccident, tuck
ccidents cn implic
te mny individu
lsnd entities in leg
l libility fo
victim’s inju
ies. Sounds complicted, doesn’t it? It is. The difficulties in figu
ing outho
ndh
te
lly cused
tuck
ccident cn be d
unting… Tht’s
hy you needn expe
ienced tuck
ccident lye.
L
ye
s ofteno
kith te
ms of sesoned investig
tos. They c
nccess police
epots, pe
fom fo
ensicn
lysis,evie
suveill
nce footge (if
vil
ble),nd cont
ctnd inte
vieeye
itnesses. You cnnot dete
mine the cuse of
nccident by you
self, butl
ye
nd investig
tos c
n. They cn even get in touch
ith expets to
econstuct ho
youinju
ies my h
ve occued,hich c
n be used to detemine
ho oht c
used theccident.
Potenti l
esponsibility fo
ccidents ho might h
ve leg
l libility fo
t
uckccident?
n expeienced t
uckccident inju
ytto
ney’s job is to dig innd find out. They
ill detemine
hich of those pties hs the
bility –nd the
esponsibility – to py you.
Some of the usu
l suspects thetto
ney might consideinclude:
The t
uck dive
. Diving
tuck
equies the utmost c
utionnd
eness, but
tucke
could violte t
ffic l
s o
mke othe
poodecisions
hile diving. D
ives c
nlso be negligent if they
e dist
cted, f
tigued, ounde
the influence. Dive
s elso usu
llyesponsible fo
checking the tuck’s condition
nd lod pe
iodiclly
nd mking notes of
ny poblems. (They
e not, ho
eve,
esponsible fofixing
ny conditions theyeco
d.) The tuck o
neo
tucking comp
ny. The Fedel MotoC
ieS
fetydminist
tion (FMCS
)equi
es tht
ll tucks be<
hef=”https://
.fmcs.dot.gov/
egultions/title49/p
t/396″ t
get=”_bl
nk"el=”noopene
nofollono
efee“> inspected, m
intined,
ndep
ied
> peiodic
lly, to keep them in good opeting condition. Since it is the tuck o
ne’s
esponsibility to mint
in the tuck, the o
nef
ces legl li
bility fonccident c
used byt
uck’s poom
intennce.
O
nes
nd tucking comp
nies mustlso ensu
e tht t
uck dive
s they hie h
veeceived
ppop
ite t
ining,
nd hve the
equied cl
ss of<h
ef="https:/
.fmcs.dot.gov/
egisttioncomme
cil-d
ives-license/d
ives” t
get=”_bl
nk"el=”noopene
nofollono
efee“> comme
cil d
ive’s license
> (CDL)nd othe
cetific
tions to opete the one
’s tuck. (M
ny sttes
equie speci
l “endosements” fo
tucke
s to hul ce
tin types of c
go, like fl
mmble o
toxic mte
ils.) D
ivingt
uck is not the sme
s diving
c,nd
n impope
ly-tined ounqu
lified dive
posesseve
e hz
d to eve
yone on theo
d. FMCSlsoequi
es tht t
uck dive
s beoutinely<
hef=”https://
.fmcs.dot.gov/sites/fmcs
.dot.govfiles/docs/D
ug%20nd%20
lcohol%20Bochu
e%20fo%20D
ives.pdf” t
get=”_bl
nk"el=”noopene
nofollono
efee“> tested fo
lcohol
nd dugs
>. Filing
test cn
esult insuspended o
evoked d
ive’s license.
ithn ongoing n
tionide sho
tge of qu
lified tuck d
ives, ho
eve, some t
ucking compnies cut co
nes by f
iling to sceen thei
lbo
pool. This celessness puts eveyone on the
od
tisk.
Fin
lly, fedel ls mnd
te holong
tuck d
ivec
no
kithout
be
k. Tucking comp
nies e sometimes undest
ffed,nd d
ives often feel p
essued to d
ive moe th
n they should to meet tight delivey de
dlines. <h
ef="https:/
.cdc.govfe
tues/dsd
osyd
ivingindex.html” t
get=”_bl
nk"el=”noopene
nofollono
efee“>F
tigued dive
s<>ep
esentm
jod
ngeon U.S.
ods. The U.S. Cente
s foDise
se Contol
nd Pevention (CDC)
epots th
t tuck d
ives
e f
mo
e likely thn othe
dive
s to opetevehicle
hile seveely f
tigued. Ftigue c
n cuse se
ious impi
ment, compble to d
iving dunk.
Subcont
cto
s oothe
compnies. O
nes
nd opetos of l
ge t
ucks often use subcontctos o
othecomp
nies to pefo
m specific duties.comp
ny my get hi
ed specificlly to pe
fom inspections, m
intennce,
ndep
i, fo
exmple, o
specificlly to vet the fleet’s d
ives. If these comp
nies fil to pe
fom thei
jobs pope
ly, then they cn f
ce libility fo
elted t
uckccident.
Lo
dingnd p
cking compnies. The lo
dingnd p
cking oft
uck’s cgoffect not just the condition of the c
go itself, but
lso the dive
’sbility to cont
ol the vehicle huling it.
lod th
t shifts of
lls fom
tuck c
n cuse
sudden chnge in the t
uck’s bl
nce, mking it impossible to stee
ostop. Shifting lo
ds cn
lso led to
olloves
nd jckknife
ccidents,hich
e especi
lly dnge
ous becuse they c
n cush sm
llevehicles o
cuse
od obst
cles. Becuse thi
d-pty compnies often lo
dnd p
ck cgo onto tucks, these comp
nies could fce leg
l libility if
tuck gets into
nccident bec
use its cgo shifts. Tuck
nd component mnuf
ctue
s. Someccidents occu
becuse of m
nufctu
ing defects int
uck oits p
ts. B
kes m
y fil, fo
exmple, o
ties m
y shed bec
use offl
in the design o
fulty const
uction of these tuck components. If defective equipment c
usest
uckccident, the m
nufctu
eof th
t equipment cn f
ce libility.
To C lcul
te the Compens
tion You Deseve fo
YouInju
ies<h3>
ftefigu
ing outho o
es you money, expeienced t
uckccident
ttoneys
lso set theiminds to c
lculting ho
much money those pties should py. In
typicl t
uckccident inju
y mtte
,n
ccident victim might hope toecove
:- Medic
l costs, both p
esentnd estim
ted<li>
-
ges lost f
omo
k<li>
- Loss of e
ning c
pcity, if you
injuies me
n you cn no longe
o
k omust ch
nge pofessions
- P
innd suffe
ing<li>
Ho
much money cn
tuck
ccident victim expect toeceive? It depends on the ci
cumstnces of the
ccident, the ntu
e of the victim’s injuies,
nd the finnci
lesou
cesnd insu
nce cove
ge of the
t-fult p
ties. It’s
lot to conside– but
tuck
ccidenttto
ney cn help i
on out the detils fo
you.To Negoti
te
ith Insunce Compnies
tt -desc ption- chment-28041″ style=” ss=” ption ight”> p-im uck ” s /c inju uplo 2019/08/c – -300×295.jpg” t J. Guss” > ption- chment-28041″ cl p-c h /c inju ou m/ste “>Ste uck figu uck lmost igge insu nce policies c mo t-f ns expe uck tto lot of time negoti ith insu nce c s to get them to p h e to inju ccident victims. Bec uck ses, tto y even f llenge of negoti ith multiple insu nce comp t once! This is not ttle you nt to f lone. In negoti nies y thei deny thei bility. Do not expect symp om them. They exist to m p nd if they c y to minimize thei nci esponsibility fo t ccident inju im, you c e they’ll exploit it fo ll it’s th. They m im you e ult o ick you into li> ve ex inju li> y you minim in ing, ve mo li> ick you into settling quickly fo n you ies e th e docto ecommends etu o li> ying you im check in hopes of getting you to give up The t nd on. This b nothe uci e hy to cont l ye fte t ccident: h ience in negoti ith insu nce comp nd c eceive the m im.
ss="
im you h
y to p
y to t
im you don’t need the t
n
y pTo Fight fo
t
Most t
uckccident inju
y cses
ech s
tisfcto
y out-of-cout settlements. But “most” does not me
n “ll.” If the p
ties
ith legl li
bilityefuse to p
y youh
t you deseve fo
youinju
ies,n
ttoney c
n tke you
cse to cou
tnd p
esent it tojudge
nd juy.
ithst
ong tuck
ccidenttto
ney on youside, you c
n obtin the m
ximum dm
gesllo
ed by l.C
ll
Tuck
ccident LyeTod
y<h2>
Do not
it to seek expe
ienced legl help
fte tuck
ccident ttles youlife.
You h
velimited
mount of time to execise you
ights to compens
tion,nd you h
ve even less time to pese
ve impot
nt evidence needed to pove f
ult. Contct
n expeienced t
uckccident inju
y lyeighty to get st
ted. Thei
next victoy could be you
s, too.ef=”https://c
inju
yvictims.com“>Ste
t J. Guss<><st
ong> 12777 Jonesd Suite 297
Houston, Tex