Who is at Fault in a Semi Truck Accident?

hile big t

ucks

in vit

l to the tnspo

tion of goods

oss the count

y, they

lso pose

subst

nti

ccident

isk to othe

people on the

d. In 2017,<

ef="https:

.fmcs

.dot.gov/s

fety

–

nd-st

tistics/l

ge-t

uck-

nd-bus-c

sh-f

cts-2017" tget="_bl

nk”

el="noopene

efee

“>

lmost 5,000

ccidents > involving semi-t

ucks

nd buses

esulted in f

lities. ,116,000 big t

uck

nd bus

ccidents left victims

ith se

ious, life-

lte

ing inju

ies. Most of the f

lities in those

ccidents

e the<

ef="https:

.iihs.o

g/topics/f

lity-st

tistics

det

ge-t

ucks" tget="_bl

nk”

el="noopene

efee

“> occup

nts of p

ssenge

vehicles<>, not the t

uck o

bus d

ive

s. Semi-t

uck

ccidents c

esult in ide nge of inju

ies, including:

t

um
tic bin inju
y
mput
tions,
spin
l co
d d
m
ge,
bu
ns,<
li>
b
oken bones,<
li>
nd o
g
n tum
.

If you suffe

ed se

ious inju

ies in

semi-t

uck

ccident, you m

y need to seek compens

tion in the fo

m of

son

l inju

y cl

im. Often, the insu

nce comp

ill

efuse to p

y fo

the full cost of you

inju

ies. You m

y need to consult

ith

n <

ef=”https://c

inju

yvictims.com

vices

houston-t

uck-

ccident-l

“>expe

ienced t

uck

ccident lye

> to bette

unde

nd the

s to sevel common questions follo

ing

semi-t

uck

ccident, including:

ho — o

t -- ex

ctly is the entity

esponsible fo

the

ccident? In the c

se of

semi-t

uck

ccident, you m

ondeho bes mo

esponsibility fo

the

ccident: the d

ive

the t

ucking comp

ny. The

n be quite complic

ted.

esponde
t Supe
io
<
h2>
Unde

esponde
t supe
io
,
L
tin phse th
t me
ns “let the m
ste

ns
e
,” employe
s be
esponsibility fo

ctions committed by thei
employees unde
the scope of thei
no
m
l job
esponsibilities.
esponde
t supe
iossumes th
t the employee committed those
cts unintention
lly.
d
ive

ho delibe

tely c
used
c

sh, fo
ex
mple,
ould not f
ll unde
this st
tute. Ho
eve
, the p
inciple does not include eve
y t
uck
ccident.
o
king
ith
l

ye
c
n help you mo
e effectively dete
mine
ho bes
esponsibility fo
youccident.

Dete
mining
ho Bes Li
bility

fte t

uck

ccident, you m

utom

tic

lly

ssume th

esponde

t supe

pplies,

nd the comp

ho employs the d

ive

should p

y fo

the expenses

ssoci

ted

ith you

ccident. Most of the time, h

ving the comp

ny t

esponsibility me

bette

outcome fo

the victim of the

ccident

nd the t

uck d

ive

. Lge comp

nies often h

ve mo

e funds

ble

nd the me

ns to investig

te the

ccident fully.

hen the comp

ny t

kes

esponsibility fo

the

ccident, it c

llevi

te some of the p

essu

e on the t

uck d

ive

nd p

ovide bette

compens

tion fo

the

ccident victim. Ho

eve

, pe

ps you

ill find you

self de

ling

ith the t

uck d

ive

’s pe

son

l insu

nce comp

ny, inste

So,

lly bes li

bility? E

ch c

se m

y vy,

king

ith

ill help you dete

mine

ho be

s li

bility in the c

se of you

ccident. C

efully conside

the follo

ing scen

ios:

De
ling
ith Cont

cto
s<
h3>

ong>The d
ive
contcts independently fo
the t
ucking comp
ny,

the
th
n the comp
ny employing the d
ive
di
ectly ong>.
s
n independent contcto
, the d
ivelys bes
esponsibility fo
thei
decisions,
nd the comp
ny p
ob
bly
ill not p
y the bill o

ccept leg
l
esponsibility. The t
uck d
ive

ccepts
esponsibilities
s
self-employed individu
l. D
ive
s
ho d
ive on cont

ct,

the
th
n
s employees, typic
lly o
n thei
t
uck. They e
esponsible fo
m
inten
nce of the vehicle
nd fo

ny
ccidents th
t occu

s they d
ive. Most of the time, contcto
s
lso c
y
n insunce policy designed to p
ovide full p
otection in the event of
se
ious
ccident.

ong>The t
ucking comp
ny,
eg

dless of
contcted d
ive
, p
ovides the vehicle,
nd m
inten
nce fo
th
t vehicle<
st
ong>. Im
gine th
t
cont

cted employee d
ives fo comp
ny in
vehicle the comp
ny chose. The t
ucking comp
ny dete
mines the d
ive
’s
oute
s
ell
s cove
ing
ny needed m
inten
nce on the vehicle. Unfo
tun
tely, the t
ucking comp
ny chooses to put off needed m
inten
nce on
vehicle. It f
ils
n inspection, but the comp
ny does not t
ke necess

y steps to m
ke it
o
d-
o
thy, c
using
se
ious
ccident. It needs ne
ti
es, but the comp
ny chooses to

it to
epl
ce them, c
using
n
ccident. The vehicle h
s mech
nic
l p
oblems th
t the comp
ny knebout
nd igno
ed, c
using
n
ccident. If the comp
ny’s negligence c
used the
ccident, the comp
ny m
y still be li
bility fo
the
ccident.

ong>The t
ucking comp
ny h
s un
e
listic
equi
ements fo
its d
ive
s<
st
ong>. D
ive
s c
n spend
m
ximum of<
h
ef=”https://
.fmcs
.dot.gov/
egul
tions/hou
s-se
vice/summ

y-hou
s-se
vice-
egul
tions” t

get=”_bl
nk"
el=”noopene
no
efe

e
"> ten hou
s > behind the
heel
fte
t
king
t le
st eleven consecutive hou
s off. Unfo
tun
tely, m
ny t
ucking comp
nies h
ve policies th
t fo
ce d
ive
s to go beyond those
equi
ements. The comp
ny m
y push its d
ive
s to get th
ough
specific numbe
of miles
d
y,
ithout le
ving time fo
stops o
fo
t

ffic flo
p
oblems. D
ive
s m
y even
eceive encou

gement to m
ke edits to thei
logbooks o
to igno
e the hou
s th
t they should spend on the
o
d,
s long
s they meet those de
dlines. Comp
nies m
y issue th
e
ts of using othe
cont

cto
s o
levy fines
nd pen
lties fo
d
ive
s
ho f
il to
e
ch thei
destin
tion on time. If the comp
ny pushes the d
ive
unnecess

ily o
sets un
e
listic expect
tions, th
t comp
ny m
y still be some
esponsibility if the d
ive
c
uses
n
ccident
ith inju
ies.<
li>

D
ive
Employed by the T
ucking Comp
ny<
h3>
hen
d
ive
employed by the t
ucking comp
ny c
uses
n
ccident, the t
ucking comp
ny usu
lly t
kes on
esponsibility fo
th
t
ccident. In some c
ses, ho
eve
, the comp
ny m
y shift li
bility b
ck to the d
ive
.

ong>The d
ive
c
used
n
ccident off the clock ong>. The d
ive
did not c
use
n
ccident
hile d
iving fo
the comp
ny; inste
d, the d
ive
c
used
n
ccident
hile t
king c

e of pe
son
l
esponsibilities. Fo
ex
mple, the d
ive
unhooked the t
uck f
om its tile
s, took the t
uck itself to est
u

nt fo
dinne
,
nd c
used
n
ccident
hile b
cking out of
pking sp
ce, the comp
ny m
y not be
esponsibility fony inju
ies th
t occued in th
t
ccident.<
li>

ong>The d
ive
c
used
n
ccident delibe

tely ong>. The d
ive
h
d
se
ious c
se of
o
d ge
nd chose to
un
nothe
vehicle off the
o
d
fte
it pulled ove
in f
ont of the d
ive
elie
in the jou
ney. Pe
h
ps the d
ive
s iv
l d
iveith
hom they qu
eled befo
e
nd chose to c
use
n
ccident.
ny time
d
ive
chooses to c
use
n
ccident delibetely, th
t d
ive
be

s pe
son
l
esponsibility fony inju
ies
nd p
ope
ty d
m
ge c
used by the
ccident. On the othe
h
nd, the comp
ny m
y still be li
bility if the comp
ny kne
the d
ive
h
d
histo
y of violence o
c
used otheccidents in the p
st,
nd the comp
ny chose to continue to employ the d
ivenyy. T
lking
ith
l

ye
c
n help bette
dete
mine li
bility in this inst
nce.

ong>The d
ive
c
used the
ccident
hile on the clock
nd
hile pu
suing no
m
l job
esponsibilities ong>.
hen
d
ive
c
uses
n
ccident on the clock,
hile pe
fo
ming t
sks in thei
job desc
iption, the comp
ny often
ccepts
esponsibility fo
th
t
ccident.
d
ive
employed by
the t
ucking comp
ny
ho is on the clock, often
llo
s fo stightfod
esolution
nd dete
min
tion of li
bility. This includes
ccidents
he
e the d
ive
checked
cell phone o

te, c
using distction;
ccidents
he
e the t
uck spun out of cont
ol o
pooe
the
conditions c
used
n
ccident;
nd
ccidents
he
e mech
nic
l f
ilu
e led to se
ious p
oblems fo
the d
ive
,
esulting in
n
ccident.

Othe
Pties
ho Could Be
esponsibility<
h3>
In some c
ses, neithe
the d
ive
of the t
uck no
the comp
ny th
t employs the d
iveill be
esponsibility fo
the
ccident. Othe
potenti
l f
cto
s could ch
nge li
bility
nd ch
nge
hich entity must cove
you
expenses
nd p
y you
d
m
ges.

The c

go lo
de
f
iled to p
ope
ly secu
e m
te
i
ls on
big t
uck. In some c
ses, f
lling o
shifting c

go c
n se
iously imp
i d
ive
’s
bility to s
fely c
y the c

go to its destin
tion.
hen
f
lling box o
othe
l

ge object c
uses
n
ccident o
d
m
ge to
nothe
vehicle, the c

go lo
de
m
y be
esponsibility.

The vehicle m
nuf
ctu
e
.
hen
ne
t
uck hits the
o
d fo
the fi
st time, it should ope

te smoothly. Unfo
tun
tely, sometimes m
nuf
ctu
e
defects c
n c
use se
ious h
z

ds on the
o
d. If
m
nuf
ctu
e
defect le
ds to
n
ccident, the m
nuf
ctu
e
m
y she li
bility fo
the
ccident.

hy Does It M
tte

ho Be

s Li
bility?<
h2>
In
n o
din

y
ccident
ith
semi-t
uck, you m
y
ssume th
t filing
cl
im
ith the insu

nce comp
ny p
esented by the d
ivet the time of the
ccident
ill get you the compens
tion you need fo
you
inju
ies. This
ill indeed help get compens
tion fony p
ope
ty d
m
ge c
used by the
ccident. You m
y, fo
ex
mple, h
ve epl
cement vehicle p
id fo
if the
ccident tot
led you
vehicle. Ho
eve
, simply cont
cting the insu

nce comp
ny p
ovided by the d
ive
m
y not help you g
in the full compens
tion you dese
ve fo
you
inju
ies. Cont
cting
lye
c
n help you mo
e effectively dete
mine ex
ctly
h
t compens
tion you dese
ve fo
you
inju
ies. Ho
eve
, you m
y file fo
the follo
ing:

Medic
l expenses. In
ddition to p
ope
ty d
m
ge, you c
n file
cl
im fo
medic
l expenses
ssoci
ted
ith the
ccident. The insunce comp
ny m
y
utom
tic
lly offe
compens
tion fo
you
medic
l bills, o
you m
y need to file
specific cl
im th
t lists
ll of the d
m
ges
ssoci
ted
ith the
ccident. This might include:

Physic
l the

py expenses

<
h
ef=”https://
.m
yoclinic.o
g
dise
ses-conditions
spin
l-co
d-inju
y
di
gnosis-t
e
tment
d
c-20377895" tget="_bl
nk”
el="noopene
no
efee
“>Modific
tions to you
home o
vehicle<> to
ccount fo
pe
m
nent o
long-te
m inju
ies

The cost of hospit
liz
tion, including su
ge
ies

Medic
tions to m
n
ge p
in o
comb
t infection f
om you
inju
ies<
li>

mbul
nce t

nspo
t<
li>

The cost of qu
lified nu
sing c

e, if you need
ssist
nce

Lost

ges. Did you

ccident c
use inju
ies th
t m
de it necess

y fo
you to miss time
t
o
k? You m
y include lost ges
s p

t of you
cl
im. Cove

ge fo
lost ges c
n m
ke it e
sie
fo
you to t
ke ce of you
bills
nd expenses in spite of the lost time
t
o
k
fte
you

ccident.

Lost e

ning potenti
l.
o
king
ith
lye
c
n help you bette
c
lcul
te ho
the
ccident could imp
ct you
futu
e enings.
hen you suffe
pe
m
nent inju
ies th
t p
event you f
om
etu
ning to you
fo
me
type of employment, cl
iming lost ening potenti
l c
n m
ke it e
sie
fo
you to p
y you
bills
hile you pu
sue
nothe
type of employment. Compens
tion fo
lost ges c
n
lso help you p
y fo
the cost of futu
e t

ining, including
ne
deg
ee o
ce
tific
tion.

P
in
nd suffe
ing.
hen c
lcul
ting p
in
nd suffe
ing, the insunce comp
ny m
y use
specific sc
le b
sed on the
mounts
ssoci
ted
ith you
othe
d
m
ges.
lye
, ho
eve
, c
n help you bette
c
lcul
te p
in
nd suffe
ing, including f
cto
s like the embssment you suffe
ed
s esult of you
inju
ies
nd the
ctivities you h
d to miss bec
use of you
inju
ies.

S
ving Time
nd Money<
h3>
In
ddition to helping you decide ho
to pu
sue compens
tion fo
the full cost of you
inju
ies, identifying the
esponsible p

ty c
n help s
ve you time
nd money
s you pu
sue you
cl
im. If you file
ith the

ong p

ty—filing
ith the t
ucking comp
ny inste
d of
contcted d
ive
o d
ive

ho c
used the
ccident off the clock, fo
ex
mple—you m
y ste v
lu
ble time. Filing
ith the

ong insu

nce comp
ny c
n del
y youbility to get funds in you
h
nds
fte
the
ccident. If you
ccident
lly file
ith the ong entity, you m
y even h
ve you
cl
im denied.

Ho
C
n You Dete
mine Li
bility?<
h2>
In some c
ses, you m
y st
uggle to identify
ho be

s li
bility fo
you

ccident
nd, the
efo
e, fo
you
inju
ies. You m
y h
ve questions to
ns
e
befo
e dete
mining
ho be

s li
bility.
o
king
ith
lye
c
n help you mo
e effectively dete
mine ex
ctly
ho bes li
bility fo
youccident. Th
t
tto
ney c
n do some
ese

ch, dete
mine
hethe
the t
uck d
ive
d
ove independently os
n employee of the comp
ny,
nd even ev
lu
te
h
t othe
f
cto
s m
y h
ve led to the
ccident. By
o
king
ith
l

ye
, you c
n
lso subst
nti
lly st
e
mline the p
ocess of getting the compens
tion you dese
ve in you
h
nds.

<
h
ef=”https://c

inju
yvictims.comp-content
uplo
ds
2019/08/c

–
ccident-lye
.jpg”>ss=”
p-im
ge-28041
lignleft" s
c=”https://c

inju
yvictims.comp-content
uplo
ds
2019/08/c

–
ccident-lye
.jpg”
lt="Ste
t J. Guss”
idth="149" height="146"
> >Did you suffe
se
ious inju
ies in
t
uck
ccident? <
h
ef="https:
/c

inju
yvictims.com
cont
ct-us
/”>Cont
ct<>
licensed
tto
ney to help you bette

ssess
ho bes
esponsibility fo
the
ccident
nd pu
sue you
cl
im.

Detemining ho Bes Libility

Testimonials

Read More

Dete
mining
ho Bes Li
bility