ucks
emin vit
l to the tnspot
tion of goodsc
oss the county, they
lso posesubst
ntil
ccidentisk to othe
people on theo
d. In 2017,<h
ef="https:/
.fmcs.dot.gov/s
fetyd
t–
nd-sttistics/l
ge-t
uck-nd-bus-c
sh-f
cts-2017" tget="_blnk”
el="noopeneno
efee“>
lmost 5,000ccidents
> involving semi-tucks
nd busesesulted in f
tlities. ,116,000 big t
ucknd bus
ccidents left victimsith se
ious, life-lte
ing injuies. Most of the f
tlities in those
ccidentse
e the<h
ef="https:/
.iihs.og/topics/f
tlity-st
tisticsdet
ill
ge-t
ucks" tget="_blnk”
el="noopeneno
efee“> occup
nts of pssenge
vehicles<>, not the tuck o
bus dive
s. Semi-tuck
ccidents cn
esult in ide nge of injuies, including:
- t
um
tic bin injuy
-
mput
tions,
- spin
l cod d
mge,
- bu
ns,<li>
- b
oken bones,<li>
-
nd o
g
n tum.
If you suffe
ed seious inju
ies insemi-t
uckccident, you m
y need to seek compenstion in the fo
m ofpe
sonl inju
y clim. Often, the insu
nce comp
nyill
efuse to py fo
the full cost of youinju
ies. You my need to consult
ithn <
hef=”https://c
inju
yvictims.comse
viceshouston-t
uck-ccident-l
ye
“>expe
ienced tuck
ccident lye> to bette
unde
stnd the
nse
s to sevel common questions folloing
semi-tuck
ccident, including:ho — o
h
t -- exctly is the entity
esponsible fothe
ccident? In the cse of
semi-tuck
ccident, you my
ondeho bes moe
esponsibility fothe
ccident: the dive
othe t
ucking compny. The
nse
cn be quite complic
ted.esponde
t Supeio
<h2>
Unde
esponde
t supeio
,L
tin phse tht me
ns “let the mste
ns
e,” employe
s beesponsibility fo
ctions committed by thei
employees undethe scope of thei
nom
l jobesponsibilities.
espondet supe
iossumes tht the employee committed those
cts unintentionlly.
dive
ho delibe
tely c
usedc
sh, fo
exmple,
ould not fll unde
this sttute. Ho
eve, the p
inciple does not include evey t
uckccident.
oking
ithl
ye
cn help you mo
e effectively detemine
ho besesponsibility fo
youccident.Dete
mining
ho Bes Libility fte t
uck
ccident, you my
utomtic
llyssume th
tesponde
t supeio
pplies,
nd the compny
ho employs the dive
should py fo
the expensesssoci
tedith you
ccident. Most of the time, h
ving the compny t
keesponsibility me
nsbette
outcome fothe victim of the
ccidentnd the t
uck dive
. Lge compnies often h
ve moe funds
vil
blend the me
ns to investigte the
ccident fully.hen the comp
ny tkes
esponsibility fothe
ccident, it cn
llevite some of the p
essue on the t
uck dive
nd p
ovide bettecompens
tion fothe
ccident victim. Hoeve
, peh
ps youill find you
self deling
ith the tuck d
ive’s pe
sonl insu
nce comp
ny, insted.
So,
hoe
lly bes libility? E
ch cse m
y vy,nd
oking
ithl
ye
ill help you dete
mineho be
s li
bility in the cse of you
ccident. C
efully conside
the folloing scen
ios:
De ling
ith Cont
cto
s<h3>
ong>The d ive
contcts independently fothe t
ucking compny,
the
thn the comp
ny employing the dive
diectly ong>.
s
n independent contcto, the d
ivelys besesponsibility fo
theidecisions,
nd the compny p
obbly
ill not py the bill o
ccept leg
lesponsibility. The t
uck dive
ccepts
esponsibilitiess
self-employed individul. D
ives
ho dive on cont
ct,
the
thn
s employees, typiclly o
n theit
uck. They eesponsible fo
minten
nce of the vehiclend fo
ny
ccidents tht occu
s they d
ive. Most of the time, contctos
lso cy
n insunce policy designed to povide full p
otection in the event ofse
iousccident.
ong>The t ucking comp
ny,eg
dless of
contcted dive
, povides the vehicle,
nd minten
nce foth
t vehicle<st
ong>. Imgine th
tcont
cted employee d
ives fo compny in
vehicle the compny chose. The t
ucking compny dete
mines the dive
’soute
sell
s coveing
ny needed minten
nce on the vehicle. Unfotun
tely, the tucking comp
ny chooses to put off needed minten
nce onvehicle. It f
ilsn inspection, but the comp
ny does not tke necess
y steps to m
ke ito
d-o
thy, cusing
seious
ccident. It needs neti
es, but the compny chooses to
it to
eplce them, c
usingn
ccident. The vehicle hs mech
nicl p
oblems tht the comp
ny kneboutnd igno
ed, cusing
nccident. If the comp
ny’s negligence cused the
ccident, the compny m
y still be libility fo
theccident.
ong>The t ucking comp
ny hs un
elistic
equiements fo
its dive
s<st
ong>. Dive
s cn spend
mximum of<
hef=”https://
.fmcs.dot.gov/
egultions/hou
s-sevice/summ
y-hou
s-sevice-
egultions” t
get=”_bl
nk"el=”noopene
noefe
e
"> ten hous
> behind theheel
ftet
kingt le
st eleven consecutive hous off. Unfo
tuntely, m
ny tucking comp
nies hve policies th
t foce d
ives to go beyond those
equiements. The comp
ny my push its d
ives to get th
oughspecific numbe
of milesd
y,ithout le
ving time fostops o
fot
ffic flo
poblems. D
ives m
y eveneceive encou
gement to m
ke edits to theilogbooks o
to ignoe the hou
s tht they should spend on the
od,
s longs they meet those de
dlines. Compnies m
y issue the
ts of using othecont
cto
s olevy fines
nd penlties fo
dive
sho f
il toe
ch theidestin
tion on time. If the compny pushes the d
iveunnecess
ily o
sets une
listic expecttions, th
t compny m
y still be someesponsibility if the d
ivec
usesn
ccidentith inju
ies.<li>
D
ive
Employed by the Tucking Comp
ny<h3>
hend
iveemployed by the t
ucking compny c
usesn
ccident, the tucking comp
ny usully t
kes onesponsibility fo
tht
ccident. In some cses, ho
eve, the comp
ny my shift li
bility bck to the d
ive.
ong>The d ive
cused
nccident off the clock ong>. The d
ive
did not cuse
nccident
hile diving fo
the compny; inste
d, the dive
cused
nccident
hile tking c
e of pe
sonl
esponsibilities. Foex
mple, the dive
unhooked the tuck f
om its tiles, took the t
uck itself to estu
nt fo
dinne,
nd cused
nccident
hile bcking out of
pking spce, the comp
ny my not be
esponsibility fony injuies th
t occued in tht
ccident.<li>
ong>The d ive
cused
nccident delibe
tely ong>. The d
ive
hd
seious c
se ofo
d gend chose to
unnothe
vehicle off theo
dfte
it pulled ovein f
ont of the dive
eliein the jou
ney. Peh
ps the dive
s ivl d
iveithhom they qu
eled befoe
nd chose to cuse
nccident.
ny timed
ivechooses to c
usen
ccident delibetely, tht d
ivebe
s pe
sonl
esponsibility fony injuies
nd pope
ty dm
ge cused by the
ccident. On the otheh
nd, the compny m
y still be libility if the comp
ny knethe d
iveh
dhisto
y of violence oc
used otheccidents in the pst,
nd the compny chose to continue to employ the d
ivenyy. Tlking
ithl
ye
cn help bette
detemine li
bility in this instnce.
ong>The d ive
cused the
ccidenthile on the clock
ndhile pu
suing nom
l jobesponsibilities ong>.
hen
dive
cuses
nccident on the clock,
hile pefo
ming tsks in thei
job desciption, the comp
ny oftenccepts
esponsibility foth
tccident.
dive
employed bythe t
ucking compny
ho is on the clock, oftenllo
s fo stightfodesolution
nd detemin
tion of libility. This includes
ccidentshe
e the dive
checkedcell phone o
te, c
using distction;ccidents
hee the t
uck spun out of contol o
pooethe
conditions cused
nccident;
ndccidents
hee mech
nicl f
ilue led to se
ious poblems fo
the dive
,esulting in
nccident.
Othe Pties
ho Could Be
esponsibility<h3>
In some c
the d
iveof the t
uck nothe comp
ny tht employs the d
iveill beesponsibility fo
theccident. Othe
potentil f
ctos could ch
nge libility
nd chnge
hich entity must coveyou
expensesnd p
y youd
mges.
- The c
go lo
def
iled to pope
ly secue m
tei
ls onbig t
uck. In some cses, f
lling oshifting c
go c
n seiously imp
i dive
’sbility to s
fely cy the c
go to its destin
tion.hen
flling box o
othel
ge object c
usesn
ccident od
mge to
nothevehicle, the c
go lo
dem
y beesponsibility.
- The vehicle m
nufctu
e.
henne
tuck hits the
od fo
the fist time, it should ope
te smoothly. Unfo
tuntely, sometimes m
nufctu
edefects c
n cuse se
ious hz
ds on the
od. If
mnuf
ctue
defect leds to
nccident, the m
nufctu
em
y she libility fo
theccident.
hy Does It M
tte
ho Be
s Li
bility?<h2>
In
din
y
ccidentith
semi-tuck, you m
yssume th
t filingcl
imith the insu
nce comp
ny pesented by the d
ivet the time of theccident
ill get you the compenstion you need fo
youinju
ies. Thisill indeed help get compens
tion fony pope
ty dm
ge cused by the
ccident. You my, fo
exmple, h
ve eplcement vehicle p
id foif the
ccident totled you
vehicle. Hoeve
, simply contcting the insu
nce comp
ny povided by the d
ivem
y not help you gin the full compens
tion you deseve fo
youinju
ies. Contcting
lyec
n help you moe effectively dete
mine exctly
ht compens
tion you deseve fo
youinju
ies. Hoeve
, you my file fo
the folloing:
Medic
l expenses. Inddition to p
opety d
mge, you c
n filecl
im fomedic
l expensesssoci
tedith the
ccident. The insunce compny m
yutom
ticlly offe
compenstion fo
youmedic
l bills, oyou m
y need to filespecific cl
im tht lists
ll of the dm
gesssoci
tedith the
ccident. This might include:- Physic
l the
py expenses
- <
hef=”https://
.myoclinic.o
gdise
ses-conditionsspin
l-cod-inju
ydi
gnosis-te
tmentd
c-20377895" tget="_blnk”
el="noopeneno
efee“>Modific
tions to youhome o
vehicle<> toccount fo
pem
nent olong-te
m injuies
- The cost of hospit
liztion, including su
geies
- Medic
tions to mn
ge pin o
combt infection f
om youinju
ies<li>
-
mbul
nce t
nspo
t<li>
- The cost of qu
lified nusing c
e, if you need
ssistnce
Lost
ges. Did you
ccident c
use injuies th
t mde it necess
y fo
you to miss timet
ok? You m
y include lost gess p
t of you
clim. Cove
ge fo
lost ges cn m
ke it esie
foyou to t
ke ce of youbills
nd expenses in spite of the lost timet
ok
fteyou
ccident.
Lost e
ning potenti
l.o
kingith
lyec
n help you bettec
lculte ho
theccident could imp
ct youfutu
e enings.hen you suffe
pem
nent injuies th
t pevent you f
ometu
ning to youfo
metype of employment, cl
iming lost ening potentil c
n mke it e
siefo
you to py you
billshile you pu
suenothe
type of employment. Compenstion fo
lost ges cn
lso help you py fo
the cost of futue t
ining, including
nedeg
ee oce
tifiction.
P
innd suffe
ing.hen c
lculting p
innd suffe
ing, the insunce compny m
y usespecific sc
le bsed on the
mountsssoci
tedith you
othed
mges.
lye, ho
eve, c
n help you bettec
lculte p
innd suffe
ing, including fcto
s like the embssment you suffeed
s esult of youinju
iesnd the
ctivities you hd to miss bec
use of youinju
ies.S
ving Time
nd Money<h3>
In
to pu
sue compenstion fo
the full cost of youinju
ies, identifying theesponsible p
ty c
n help sve you time
nd moneys you pu
sue youcl
im. If you fileith the
ong p
ty—filing
ith the tucking comp
ny insted of
contcted dive
o dive
ho c
used theccident off the clock, fo
exmple—you m
y ste vlu
ble time. Filingith the
ong insu
nce comp
ny cn del
y youbility to get funds in youh
ndsfte
theccident. If you
ccidentlly file
ith the ong entity, you my even h
ve youcl
im denied.Ho
C
n You Detemine Li
bility?<h2>
In some c
y st
uggle to identifyho be
s li
bility foyou
ccident
nd, theefo
e, foyou
injuies. You m
y hve questions to
nse
befoe dete
miningho be
s li
bility.o
kingith
lyec
n help you moe effectively dete
mine exctly
ho bes libility fo
youccident. Tht
ttoney c
n do someese
ch, dete
minehethe
the tuck d
ived
ove independently osn employee of the comp
ny,nd even ev
lute
ht othe
fcto
s my h
ve led to theccident. By
oking
ithl
ye
, you cn
lso substnti
lly ste
mline the pocess of getting the compens
tion you deseve in you
hnds.
<
hef=”https://c
inju
yvictims.comp-contentuplo
ds2019/08/c
–
ccident-lye.jpg”>ss=”
ge-28041
lignleft" sc=”https://c
inju
yvictims.comp-contentuplo
ds2019/08/c
–
ccident-lye.jpg”
lt="Stet J. Guss”
idth="149" height="146">
>Did you suffese
ious injuies in
tuck
ccident? <h
ef="https:/c
inju
yvictims.comcont
ct-us/”>Cont
ct<>licensed
ttoney to help you bette
ssess
ho besesponsibility fo
theccident
nd pusue you
clim.