Six Methods fo P
oving You
Clim
Coming out on top in
n insunce clim o
peson
l injuy l
suit
fte cccident
equies dete
mining libility,
hich isn’tl
ys
n esy t
sk. Sevel pties (insuncedjuste
s, investigto
s, police, dive
s,itnesses,
nd moe) put thei
to cents in, but they don’t
lys tell the tuth. Figu
ing outho h
s legl li
bility fosomeone’s c
ccident injuies involves using clues
nd evidence to piece togetheho hithom.
If you
ee involved in
cccident, you’
e stessed enough. You shouldn’t h
ve to del
ith lying, cheting,
nd mnipul
tion fom those
ho ty to
void finnci
l libility. Belo
the <h
ef="https:/c
inju
yvictims.comse
vicesc
–
ccident-lye/”>c
ccidenttto
neys<>t <
hef=”https://c
inju
yvictims.com“>Ste
t J. Guss<> discuss hoto p
oveho hit you,
nd hoto hold them
ccountble.
Negligent D ive
s Lie to
void Finnci
lesponsibility
If someone
ccidentlly h
ms you, you hope they
ould nt to mke things
ight. Hoeve
, cusing
cccident, especi
llyhen bodily inju
y ode
th is involved, cn be costly fo
thet-f
ult dive
. Motoists
ithc
iminl histo
y o bd d
ivingeco
d often feel the need to lie tovoid consequences like the fines, fees, inc
esed insu
nce
tes,
nd othecosts th
t comeith c
usingn
ccident.cco
ding to the Ntion
l Highy Tnspot
tion Sfety
dministtion (NHTS), b
d diving
epesents is
pev
sive, chonic p
oblem. Moe th
n 51,000 dive
se
e in ft
l cshesc
oss the ntion in just one ye
,
nd mny h
d pevious
ecods
ndccidents. These
lming sttistics include:
- 8,423 (16.4%) of d
ives in
eck hd p
evious cshes.<em>
- 7,253 (14%) h
d pevious license suspensions o
evoc
tions.<em>
- 9,647 (18%) h
d pevious speeding tickets.
- 1,573 (3%) h
d pevious DUIs
.
son d
ives might lie
boutn
ccident is tovoid losing thei
job, if they dive
compny vehicle o
comme
cil vehicle. Othe
dive
s might lie tovoid
cking up “points”
ginst thei
license tht could
esult in suspension. If you’ve been involved inc
ccidentfte
nothe
c stuck you
vehicle, don’t let the dive
gety
ith it! Contct
cccident
ttoney
ho cn help you hold the negligent d
iveccountble. They
ill use theiexpe
tise too
kith insu
nce comp
nies, l enfocement, investig
tos,
nd foensic scientists.
The follo
ing methods could help you in youpu
suit of justice:Method One: Photogphic Evidence<
h2>
hen policeive
t the scene ofn
ccident, they ite don f
ctsnd st
tements tht eventu
lly go inton offici
l cshepo
t. In some cses, office
s tke photos o
ddi
gms. But police cn’t t
ke pictues of
nccident scene until they get to the
ccident scene.lot could ch
nge in the time it tkes fo
them to get thee, like c
s moving out of the
y of t
ffic o
d
ivele
ving the scene of theccident
ltogethe. V
luble evidence could be lost o
displced du
ing these moments. Use yousm
tphone to t
ke photos ofn
ccident scene. They could pove inc
edibly vlu
ble.hile
photo doesn’t necessily pove
ht h
ppened, it cn sho
clues tht suppo
t othephysic
l evidence, mking it e
siefo
l enfocement,
ccident investigto
s,nd cou
ts to detemine
ho ist f
ult.emembe
, thee is no such thing
s “too much evidence!” Mke su
e to cptu
e close-upnd
ide imges of
ll involved vehiclesnd the d
mge done to them,
sell
s yousu
oundings like sign
ge, lights, oothe
dm
ged pope
ty. Photogph theo
d’s suf
ces
ell – slick spots oskid m
ks could be useful in p
oving hothe
ccident hppened
nd helping investigto
s piece togethethe f
cts. Photos cn even point to othe
souces of evidence th
t could help pove
ho hithom. Fo
exmple,
photo might depictitnesses, o
could shovideo su
veillnce c
mes in the bckg
ound. Tking photos o
video ofn
ccident scene—especilly befo
e fist
espondes
ive—could mke
ll the diffeence in you
settlement.Method T
o: Video
ecoding
Like photog
phs, video
ecodings of
nccident p
ovide undenible evidence
boutho hit
hom inc
ccident. Mny people choose to inst
ll dshbo
d c
mes in theivehicles. If you don’t h
ved
sh cm, check to see if
itness o
othed
iveinvolved in the
ccident might hve one.
M
ny citiesnd to
ns noh
ve tffic cme
s
t intesections,
hich povide video
ecodings th
t cn
evel
ho ist f
ult inn
ccident. Businesses fom
estu
nts to convenience sto
es, bnks,
ndet
il shops often hve secu
ity cme
s. In some c
ses, theisecu
ity cme
foot
ge might point tod
steet
nd cptu
en
ccident. Finlly, p
ssesby o
itnesses m
ylso h
ve cell phone photos ovideo of the
ccident. Youl
ye
cn discove
nd ev
lute the usefulness of these files fo
youc
ccident clim.
Video foot
ge of youccident helps investigto
s get thee
l stoy
hent-f
ult dive
s e tying to dodge
esponsibility. Policeon’t
lys seek out this video, even if it exists, butn expe
ienceduto
ccident injuy
ttoney h
s the detemin
tionnd
esouces needed to hunt do
n this evidence foyou
nd youc
se.Method Th
ee:
itness Sttements
If
cccident occu
s onbusy st
eet, othec
s might stop
nd help. In some cses, these moto
istsitnessed the c
ccidentnd
ill stick ound to give theist
tement to the police. Buteg
dless of
hetheitness
its fo
policend eme
gencyesponse te
ms toive
t the scene of theccident, you should
sk fothei
contct info
mtion.
itness sttements c
n seve
spo
eful tool to help suppo
t youecollection ofn
ccidentnd c
n help police come toconclusion
boutho hit
hom. Sometimesitnesses might not h
vell the det
ils ofn
ccident, but they cn still help fill in the g
psbout
ht h
ppened immeditely befo
e ofte tffic csh. It’s unlikely tht
itness testimony by itselfill dete
mineho c
usedc
ccident (lthough it ce
tinly could in some c
ses). Yet,hen combined
ith otheevidence
nd the policeepo
t,itness st
tements cn become v
luble tools to elimin
te questionsbout the c
use of –nd fin
ncil li
bility fo–
cccident. This is
hy it’s impot
nt to collect the contct info
mtion of
s mny
itnessess possible
fte cccident.
Method Fou : Event D
t
eco
deDid you kno
moe th
n<h
ef="https:/
.np.o
gsections/
lltechconsideed/2013/03/20/174827589/yes-you
-ne-c
-h
s--bl
ck-box-he
es-the-off-sitch” t
get=”_bl
nk"el=”noopene
nofollono
efee“> 90 pe
cent of nec
s h
ve event dt
eco
des
> (EDs) th
teco
d infom
tion fom
vehicle’s mostecent collision?
n EDis
device simil to the flight dt
eco
des, o
“blck boxes,” on m
nyi
plnes.
t one point, the Ntion
l Highy Tnspot
tion Sfety
dministtion (NHTS)<
hef=”https://
.eute
s.comticle/us-us
-utos-
egultions/u-s-
ill-not-seek-to-equi
e-event-dt
-eco
des-in-c
s-t
ucks-idUSKCN1PU2GK" tget="_blnk”
el="noopenenofollo
noefe
e
"> consideed m
king EDs m
ndto
y<> in pssenge
vehicles butithd
eth
t popos
l becuse the v
st mjo
ity ofuto m
nufctu
es
le
dy voluntily equip vehiclesith them.<
hef=”https://
.nhts.gov/
esech-dt
event-d
t–
ecode
" tget="_blnk”
el="noopenenofollo
noefe
e
"> EDs
ecod info
mtion
> foseconds befo
e, duing,
ndfte
collision.
Ex
mples of sttistics sto
ed inn ED
include:- Vehicle dyn
mics
nd system sttus befo
e the csh<li>
- D
iveinputs
- Vehicle c
sh sign
tue
- Se
t belt use<li>
-
i
b
g deployment infom
tion<li>
-
hethe
o
notc
sh t
iggeed the
ctivtion of
nutom
tic collision notifiction system
L
enfo
cementnd insu
nce comp
nies cn use the c
sh d
tf
omn ED
to help detemine ex
ctly ho cccident occu
ed
ndho is
t fult.
Method Five: Loc tion
nd Type of D
mge
The loc
tion of the dm
ge onvehicle is one of the fi
st things l enfocement, investig
tos,
nd insuncedjuste
s lookt
fte cccident. The n
tue, extent,
nd loction of the d
mge on
c body, even if it’s “only cosmetic dm
ge,” cn help investig
tos dete
mine the speed of the vehiclest the time of imp
ct, thengle of the imp
ct,nd
hetheeithe
dive
took evsive
ction tovoid the imp
ct.chment_28041″
i
-descibedby=”c
ption-tt
chment-28041" style="idth: 225px” cl
ss="p-c
ptionlign
ight">ge-28041″ title=”T
uckccident L
ye
" sc=”https://c
inju
yvictims.comp-contentuplo
ds2019/08/c
–
ccident-lye-300×295.jpg”
lt="Stet J. Guss”
idth="225" height="221"> ption- chment-28041″ cl p-c h /c inju ou m/ste “>Ste ccident L ye figc figu t evidence c to ies of ccident h n sive ex te th d s t the c shed nd d to n even lyze p int t nsfe nd tte ch of the vehicles involved in ccident. Look out: Some vehicles m ve been involved in e, deceptive d might t m the insu nce comp iming thei ccident d ge s f ne ccident. Fo tely, investig s nies c n ust p ns in e ccident lly h hen s, p t nsfe om one vehicle to vehicle. P tte big clues fo mining ho c nd nci esponsible. m hole sto n ccident, it c te some of the possibilities.Method Six:
econst
uction Specilists
L
enfo
cementgencies, l
ye
s,nd insu
nce comp
nies sometimesely on
ccidenteconst
uction specilists
hen sevee o
ft
lccidents occu
.ccident
econstuction expe
ts tke
n in-depth scientificpp
och to find out the c
uses ofc
ccidentnd ho
itll
ent don.
Speci
listsho
econstuct
ccidents hve extensive t
ining in physics
nd engineeing. They
ely on ide y of dt
to come upith expl
ntions fo
ho csh occuednd
ho hithom. Some of the info
ccidenteconst
uction specilists
nlyze includes:
-
he
e e
ch vehicle cme to
est<li>
-
ccident scene evidence, especi
lly skid m
ks
ndo
d conditions<li>
- D
mge to e
ch vehicle<li>
- Speed e
ch c s tveling<li>
- The seve
ity of the csh<li>
- Visibility
nde
the - D
ivebeh
vio - ED
dt
<li>
- Othe
fcto
s, suchs
lcohol use, testesults,
nd distction levels<li>
The expe
tsho
eviec
sh d
tfte cccident c
n fequently dete
mineho hit
hom,nd m
ke infomed
ecommendtions fo
younext steps. In m
ny cses,
nccident
econstuction speci
list seves
sn expe
titness
ho supplies testimony in cout.
If
negligent dive
is tying to sc
m yound bl
me you fothe d
mge they c
used, you need to contct
qulified
utoccident
ttoney
s soons possible. You shouldn’t h
ve to py fo
pope
ty dm
gend pe
sonl inju
ieshen
nothed
ivehits you
c.st
ong> 12777 Jonesd Suite 297
Houston, Tex
h
ef="tel:(281) 519-7366">(281) 519-7366<a>