i
nccidents c
used byd
ive’s negligence c
nesult in se
ious injuies
nd dm
ges.fte
suchccidents, insu
nce comp
niesill do eve
ything in theipo
eto t
y to limit theili
bilitynd exposu
e. In some cses, the insu
nce comp
ny my go so f
s to deny libility
ltogethe. n><
p>
ve been inju
ed inpedest
in
ccident tht
s c
used byd
ive’s negligence, you m
y be entitled to monety compenstion fo
the injuies, d
mges, p
in,nd inconvenience th
t you hve suffe
ed. Contct pe
sonl inju
ytto
ney Stet J. Guss tod
y toeceive
fee consult
tionbout you
pedesti
nccident c
se.<sp
n><p>
n cl
ss="s1">Comptive negligence
n><
tive negligence
h3>
son
l injuy c
ses, Texs is
<h
ef="https:/
.l.conell.edu/
excomp
tive_negligence">tive negligence
te. This me
ns tht
n injued pedest
in c
n stillecove
dm
ges, even if she ptilly cont
ibuted to theccident. Tex
s follos the 51%
ule, mening th
t if the plintiff is found to be 51% o
moe
t fult fo
theccident, she c
nnotecove
ny compens
tion. Otheise, the injued pl
intiff my
ecoved
mges, but the tot
lecove
ymount is offset by the pl
intiff’s pecent
ge of fult fo
theccident. n><
p>
ex
mple, ifju
y found tht
n injued pedest
in
s 25%
esponsible fohis inju
iesnd th
t the defendnt d
ives 75%
esponsible, the injued pedest
in c
n stillecove
compenstion. Yet the pedest
in pl
intiff’s compenstion
ill beeduced by 25%—the pe
centge
ttibuted to his o
n negligence. <sp
n><p>
i
nccidents, the defend
nt dive
’s insunce compny
illttempt to sho
tht the inju
ed pedesti
n s not pying
ttention, s be
king the l (e.g., cossing
ginst the t
ffic sign
l, jy
lking, etc.), o
s textinghile
lking. n><
p>
n cl
ss="s1">educing
plintiff’s potenti
l dm
ges<b>
n><
educing
plintiff’s potenti
l dm
ges<b>
h3>
ses
hee
pedesti
n sustined se
ious injuies
ndhe
e libility is cle
, insu
nce comp
niesill oftentimes seek to limit the
mount of dm
ges tht the pl
intiff pedesti
n cn
ecove. Specific
lly, the insunce compny
ill look to othep
ioccidents, pio
injuies, degene
tive ch
nges,nd p
eexisting medicl conditions to “expl
iny” the pl
intiff’s cuent injuies. n><
p>
ex
mple, ifpedest
in
s st
uck bymoto
vehiclet
tffic intesection
nd sustined se
ious bck inju
ies in theccident, the insu
nce comp
ny my subpoen
ll of the inju
ed pedesti
n’s pio
medicl
ecods. If the pedest
in inju
ed his bck five ye
s p
ioto the
ccident, then the insunce compny
ill gue tht this p
eexisting hed inju
y s the sole op
imy cuse of the pl
intiff’s complints
nd injuies. n><
p>
n cl
ss="s1">Contct
<b>
n>n cl
ss="s1">Houston pedesti
n ccident
ttoney
n>n cl
ss="s1"> tody to discuss you
cse
n><
ct
<b>
i
nccident
ttoney
y to discuss you
cse
h3>
ny is not on you
side inpedest
in
ccident cse. If it is dete
mined tht you h
vec
se,tto
ney Stet J. Guss c
n meet the insunce compny he
d-onnd fight fo
youight toecove
monety compenstion. n><
p>
ss=”s1″>To schedule ee consult ith i ccident ney, ple ll us ss=”s2″>cont sp sp st p>